<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TRON update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/</link>
	<description>The Magic - seen from different points of view...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dirk v. Diringshofen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94257</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk v. Diringshofen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/#comment-94257</guid>
		<description>Andy said: &quot;Although I am not so happy with the 3D choice.&quot; WHY??

I have seen &quot;Chicken Little&quot; and &quot;Meet the Robinsons&quot; as well as &quot;Beowulf&quot; in 3D and can only say: the medium has come a long way since the early days. Pictures were crisp, sharp and the new glasses were easy to wear for the duration of the full length features, even on top of regular glasses. In fact the 3D-effect added depths to the visuals of the movie.

Also the directors of at least &quot;Chicken Little&quot; and &quot;Meet the Robinsons&quot; both avoided the pitfalls of earlier 3D-releases and did not include any special effects or scenes just to show off the 3D-effects (so no extra poking with sticks into the audience, no unnecessary debris flying into the audience during explosions etc.). If used subtle (as done by Disney here) it adds to the movie experience and actually makes it special to go to the theater instead of waiting for the DVD release (where I don&#039;t have to deal with popcorn crunshers and seat kickers behind me...).

I personally am all for 3D-releases if they are done like &quot;Chicken Little&quot; and &quot;Meet the Robinsons&quot; and don&#039;t go for the cheap effect. So the 3D-option might actually draw me into the theater to see the movie instead of skipping it and waiting for the DVD. By 2011 also many more theaters should be equipped to screen the 3D-releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy said: &#8220;Although I am not so happy with the 3D choice.&#8221; WHY??</p>
<p>I have seen &#8220;Chicken Little&#8221; and &#8220;Meet the Robinsons&#8221; as well as &#8220;Beowulf&#8221; in 3D and can only say: the medium has come a long way since the early days. Pictures were crisp, sharp and the new glasses were easy to wear for the duration of the full length features, even on top of regular glasses. In fact the 3D-effect added depths to the visuals of the movie.</p>
<p>Also the directors of at least &#8220;Chicken Little&#8221; and &#8220;Meet the Robinsons&#8221; both avoided the pitfalls of earlier 3D-releases and did not include any special effects or scenes just to show off the 3D-effects (so no extra poking with sticks into the audience, no unnecessary debris flying into the audience during explosions etc.). If used subtle (as done by Disney here) it adds to the movie experience and actually makes it special to go to the theater instead of waiting for the DVD release (where I don&#8217;t have to deal with popcorn crunshers and seat kickers behind me&#8230;).</p>
<p>I personally am all for 3D-releases if they are done like &#8220;Chicken Little&#8221; and &#8220;Meet the Robinsons&#8221; and don&#8217;t go for the cheap effect. So the 3D-option might actually draw me into the theater to see the movie instead of skipping it and waiting for the DVD. By 2011 also many more theaters should be equipped to screen the 3D-releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy De Maertelaere</title>
		<link>http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94253</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy De Maertelaere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/#comment-94253</guid>
		<description>While they did talk about a remake a couple of months ago, it does look like a sequel now! I could be wrong as I also seen multiple websites talk about Tron or Tron Sequel. As long as I get Tron and it is good, I&#039;ll be happy. Although I am not so happy with the 3D choice. Even so, I&#039;ll keep an open mind and hope 2011 will be the year of TRON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they did talk about a remake a couple of months ago, it does look like a sequel now! I could be wrong as I also seen multiple websites talk about Tron or Tron Sequel. As long as I get Tron and it is good, I&#8217;ll be happy. Although I am not so happy with the 3D choice. Even so, I&#8217;ll keep an open mind and hope 2011 will be the year of TRON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mousekingdom Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; And “Tron” Again - A Disney Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/comment-page-1/#comment-94252</link>
		<dc:creator>Mousekingdom Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; And “Tron” Again - A Disney Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 07:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mousekingdom.com/2008/03/04/tron-update/#comment-94252</guid>
		<description>[...] Mousekingdom Blog The Magic - seen from different points of view&#8230;      &#171; TRON update [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mousekingdom Blog The Magic &#8211; seen from different points of view&#8230;      &laquo; TRON update [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
